In Milan Sharma's work, there is a complete rapport between the disparate Egures. Let us say that love ballads are
thereby recreated here visually with a keen finesse.
Yes it is some such like human warmth which permeates the body of these feelingful compositions.The libido is in a
state of health,with nothing therein of the days morbid or the self destructive, Clearly,also,a true communication or
communion is on in between one colour and another, between objects and subjects, and things and thoughts. Life
certainly is seen to being lived to the full,since there is a connection between the lots ofthe details.All parties being on
talking terms, the counters or components in these painting have no loose ends to speak of. lt is indeed a full pictorial
speech, no matter the, at time, sidelong faces.They all face each other, never expressing any excessive neurotic
individuality.The personality ofthese is in union,not in broken fragments.
Here therefore is a celebration,the joy of living, being a fiesta of colour, the flowing of the images from the memory
right into the present moment.Thus the familiar bric-a-brac gets a transformative fresh lease of life, not as decorative
piece, but as making contribution to the here and now.The multiple faces become acceptable to our inner reason in
order that we are at peace with the world of poetic fantasy, not merely weighed down with the crushing order of
brute facts.

Largely, the work of RohitVerma takes off after a slow movement aesthetics or in a context which is under water
Gently coloured streams,the open air, and solitude it is .A whole variation in moods and emotions is expressed by
these, dreams characters. It is ecstasy and delight.At moments the contours of objects imitate the female form,at still
other occasion mother earth and her nymphs are seen in loving rapport. lt is thus the compositions, in intention.are
soothing and feelingful.This is not a hardware world as is tending to become today,making the heart also hard.
So the work speaks through slow movements and pure gesture.The beauty of the human body, in slow motion, is the
very basic of the work's appeal.Yes whatever the given mood or theme the artist is concerned with exploiting the
ability of his image to make beautiful and expressive postures .And these postures and gestures and attitudes are
rhythmic and harmonious.

Several of the highly coloured figures are slim,graceful,frail, and as though floating upon a stream. ldealized figures as
they are, yet they are also symbols of the benign states of being. Here it is not a warrior`s world of conflict but of
inward musing and reflection, and, in some cases, of a pining love and romance.And all this without exaggeration.To
remember that Rohits works are not copies of life, nor mere mirror held up to outward appearances.What they
present is,as already implied,the colourful poignancy ofthe human soul,and its concealed longings,and so they touch
the heart.
The history ofart in our times can be viewed as a pendulum swinging between the urge to copy and the urge to invent
It is obvious that we are now far removed from the former Instead of relating to external facts, visible for all to see.
artist today prefer to go inwards and conduct a specialized dialogue with each other as also with objects. Hence the
novel nature ofthe present sculpture,often of wood.This artistVikas Khajuria is trying to steer clear of imitation his
images are nit from past but from the creative mind in a totally contemporary idiom .By the very processes of refining
he turns his material into the eloquence ofa fine art.

Vikas reconciles the dual attractions of art and reality with skill. He cannot therefore be accused of replacing the
poetry of invention with the prose of fact .ln this way his work is a bridge between worlds of the past and presentTo
elaborate the above a fraction more,the sculptor shuttles between the earlier art of affect, and that ofthe exactitudes
of the physical eye,such as the academics represented.This distinction may well be expressed in terms ofwhat may be
called the subjective or objective artistic intellect.The 'objective' intellect being one which is eminently impersonal.
and the 'subjective', equally personal .The former disengaging itself as much as possible from its own prepossessions
and striving to represent objects as they exist; the other viewing all objects in light of feelings and preconceptions. Of
course, it is needless to add that no artistic mind can be exclusively 'objective' nor exclusively 'subjective'. This
sculptor holds his balance to complete satisfaction.
- Keshav Malik